Methodological and Ethical Issues in Research with Deaf Persons: Experiences from Uganda
Abstract
This paper examines the key methodological and ethical issues on the appropriateness of applying research methods designed for the hearing population while conducting research on these individuals. Based on fieldwork conducted in Uganda in 2012 and 2013, this qualitative study was informed by the interpretive theoretical proposition, which provided an overall orienting lens through which the findings were discussed. A total of 42 DHH persons were interviewed while three Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with selected individuals. The study shows that the design and application of the traditional research approaches and methods of data collection and analysis to studies involving DHH persons present a host of methodological and ethical dilemmas largely arising from its unique social and linguistic characteristics. The overall conclusion is that researchers on issues involving these ' silent ' individuals should be as flexible and dynamic as possible while applying the universally used research methods and techniques.References
Alberth, J., and Henning C. 2009. Critical Security Studies, Human Security and Peace., Linkopings University.
Albrecht, L.G., Seelman, K.D., and Bury, M. (Eds). 2001. Handbook of Disability Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications Limited.
Agar-Jacobsen & Roberta, J. 2010. A study of the learning styles of middle and high school deaf and non-deaf students in public education. PhD Dissertation, Capella University, USA.
Barron, K. 1997. "Who am I? Women with Learning Difficulties (Re)constructing their self-identity", Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 4, (1):58-79.
Bauman, H. 2008. Introduction: Listen to deaf studies. In H. L. Bauman (Ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking (pp. 1 €“32). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bisol, C. 2008. "HIV/AIDS knowledge and health-related attitudes and behaviours among deaf and hearing adolescents in Southern Brazil", American Annals of the Deaf, 35, 153:349-356.
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cline, T., and Mahon, M. 2010. "Deafness in a Multilingual Society: A review of research for practice", Educational & Child Psychology, 27, (2):41-49.
Chinn, P. 2004. Research Methods and Nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 27, (3):161-163.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. 2003. Business research methods. 8th edition. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Corker, M. 1998. Deaf and disabled, or deafness disabled?: towards a human rights perspective (2nd ed.). Mc Graw-Hill Education.
Crain, K., & Kluwin, T. 2006. The Validity of Probability Samples in Research on Deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 151, (2):144-120.
Creswell, W. J. 2008. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell J.W. 2009. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 2010.
Eckhardt, E., & Anastas, J. 2007. Research Methods with Disabled Populations. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 6, (2):233-249.
Eckhardt, E., Steinberg M.D., Lipton, D.S., Montoya, L., and Goldstein, M.F. 1999. Innovative direction in mental health assessment part III, use of interactive technology in assessment: A research project. Journal of American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 33, (4):19-29.
Edwards, N.C. 1994. Translating written material for community health research: Guidelines to enhance the process. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 85, (5):67-70.
Edwards, R. 1998 ' A Critical Examination of the Use of Interpreters in the Qualitative Research Process ' , Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 3, (24):197 €“208.
Enwereji, E. E & Enwereji, O. K. 2008. Disabled persons and HIV/AIDS prevention: a case study of deaf and leprosy persons in Nigeria. East African Journal of Public Health, 12, (5):55-61.
Ghobarah H.A., Huth, P., and Russell, B. 2004. The post war-public health effects of civil conflict, Soc Sci Med., l, (59):869-884.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grey, C. 2009. Security Studies and Organization Studies: Parallels and Possibilities. Retrieved June 12, 2013, from http://org.sagepub.com/content/16/2/303.
Groce, E. N., Yousafzai, K. A., and van der Maas, F. F. 2007. HIV/AIDS and disability: Differences in HIV/AIDS knowledge between deaf and hearing people in Nigeria. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29: 367-371. doi:10.1080/09638280600834567.
Goldstein, M. F., Eckhardt, E.A., Joyner-Creamer P., Berry R., Heather P., & Cleland C.M. 2010. What do deaf high school students know about HIV? AIDS Education and Prevention, 10, (6):523-537.
Kofi, A. 2005. In Larger Freedom; Toward Development, Security and Human Rights for All, New York: United Nations.
Ladd, P. 2003 Understanding Deaf Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Laverty, S. M. 2003. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_3final/html/laverty.ht ml
Lee, C. J. 2012. They have to see us: an ethnography of deaf people in Tanzania, PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado.
Lee, R. J. 2010. A case study of a teacher implementing guided reading in a deaf classroom. PhD Dissertation, The University of Nebraska €“Lincoln.
Lincoln, Y.S. 1995. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mercer, J. 2007. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33, (1):1-17.
Miyako, D. T. 2010. A comparison of deaf/hard of hearing and hearing young adults ' responses to a health risk behavior survey. PhD Dissertation, New York: University of Rochester School of Nursing, USA.
Montoya, A. L., Egnatovich R., Eckhardt, E., and Steinberg A. 2004. Translation challenges and strategies: The ASL translation of a computer-based psychiatric diagnostic instrument. Sign Language Studies, 8, (4):314-344.
Mprah, W.K. 2013. ' Sexual and reproductive health needs assessment with deaf people in Ghana: Methodological challenges and ethical concerns ' , African Journal of Disability 2(1), Art. #55, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v2i1.55.
Murangira, A. 2005. The Forgotten Tribe: Persons with Disabilities and HIV/AIDS; Paper Presented during the 4th National HIV/AIDS Conference, 21-22 March 2005 Speke Resort Munyonyo, Kampala €“ Uganda (unpublished).
Nassozi, B. K., and Moores, D.F. 2003. Deafness in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Annals of the Deaf, 148, (1):18-24.
Neuman, W. L. 2003. Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 5th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Newman, E. 2010. Critical Human Security Studies. Review of International Studies, 36, (5):77-94.
Obasi, C. 2008. Seeing the Deaf in "Deafness". United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Olawuyi, O. 2006. Prevalence of HIV/AIDS among deaf students in Nigeria: causes and remedies. Paper presented at the XVI International AIDS Conference, Toronto, Canada, 13-18 August, 2006.
Padden, C., and Humphries, T. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pedroni, A.J. and Pimple, K.D. 2001. ' A brief introduction to informed consent in research with human subjects ' , in Scientist and Subjects, viewed 16 January 2014, from http://poynter.indiana.edu/sas/res/ic.pdf
Peinkofer, R. 1996. HIV Education for the deaf, a vulnerable minority. Public Health Reports, 1, (3):360-396.
Pollard, R.Q. 2002. ' Ethical conduct in research involving deaf people ' , in V.A. Gutman (ed.), Ethics in Mental Health and Deafness, pp. 162 €“178, Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
Ritzer, G., and Goodman, D.J. 2004. Sociological Theory. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Sarantakos, S. 2005. Social Research, Palgrave MacMillan Publishers Limited, New York.
Steadman Group. 2007. HIV/AIDS Knowledge, Attitude and Practice and Accessibility Study. Nairobi, Kenya, Handicap International.
Stets, J. and Burke, P. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology, 3, (14):224-237.
Sutton-Spence, R. and Woll, B. 2000. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. 1994. The Politics of Recognition. In Gutmann A (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Theo, F. 2002. Constructivist security studies: Portrait of a Research Programme, International Studies Review, 4, (1):49-72.
Tobin, S. 2001. Disability in Theory: From Social Constructionism to the New Realism of the Body. American Literary History, 13, (4):737-754.
UNAD. 2010. Information Handbook, Kampala Printers Limited.
Van Manen. 2002. Researching lived experiences, State University of New York, Ontario.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © by Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except for short extracts in fair dealing, for research or private study, critical scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledgement.
The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs [ISSN 0856-0056 (Print) & ISSN 1821-889X (Online)] is published bi-annually, June and December by the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35042 €“ Dar es Salaam €“ Tanzania
