Trade-Offs between Wildlife Conservation and Local Livelihood: Evidence from Tanzania
Abstract
This article discusses sociological and anthropological factors which either support or undermine conservation endeavor in Tanzania. It is based on a study that was conducted in Saadani and Ruaha National Parks. The overall objective of the study was to understand local people ' s awareness of resources and conservation of wildlife and identify sociological and anthropological issues related to trade-offs between conservation and development. The findings show that, generally, local people perceive conservation positively and are therefore willing to conserve. However, this is different to local communities surrounding protected areas who seem to be not only critical but also negative with the way in which the conservation process is implemented. The reason behind this negative attitude is brought about by the unbalanced trade-offs between conservation benefits and their means of livelihood. As a result, conservation activities are perceived as being more prescriptive and restrictive than integrative and supportive. Based on the findings, this article concludes that local people understand the importance of conservation and would support it had there been a balance of the trade-offs between conservation and their livelihood, and if they could anticipate some benefits now and in the near future.References
Baird, D.T., Leslie, W.P. and McCabe. J. T. 2009. "The Effects of Wildlife Conservation on Local Perceptions of Risk and Behavioral Response," Human Ecology 37, 4: 463-74.
Barrett, C. B. and P. Arcesse. 1995. Are integrated conservation-development projects (ICDPs) Sustainable? On the Conservation of large mammals in Sub-Saharan Africa, World Development 23, 4:1073-84.
Brockington, D., Igoe, J. and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2006. "Conservation, Human Rights, and Poverty Reduction," Conservation Biology 20, 1: 250-2.
Colding, J. and C. Folke. 2001. "Social Taboos: ' Invisible ' Systems of Local Resource Management and Biological Conservation", Ecological Applications 11:584-600.
Fine, L. 2008. "The Legacy of National Parks: Community-Based Conservation in Tanzania and Zimbabwe." Senior Thesis: Boston University Academy.
Gibson, C.C. and Marks, S.S. 1995. "Transformation Rural Hunters into Conservationists: An Assessment of Community-Based Wildlife Management in Africa", World Development 23, 6: 941-57.
Gregg, G. 2005. "The Legal System and Widelife Conservation: History and the Law ' s Effect on Indigenous People and Community Conservation in Tanzania," Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 17, 3: 481-516.
Igoe, J. 2004. Conservation and Globalization: A Study of National Parks and Indigenous Communities from East Africa to South Dakota. Denver: Thompson.
Igoe, J. 2006. "Measuring the Coasts and Benefits of Conservation to Local Communities" Journal of Ecological Anthropology 10: 72-7.
Infeld, M. 2001. Cultural Values: A forgotten Strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa, Conservation Biology 15, 3:800-2.
Irwin, A. 2001. Sociology and the Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kideghesho, R. J. 2006. "Wildlife conservation and local Land use conflicts in Western Serengeti Corridor, Tanzania". Ph.D Thesis: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Lutz, W., L. Prieto, and W. Sanderson. 2000. Population, Development and Environment on the Yutican Peninsula: From Ancient May to 2030, Vienna: IIASA.
Nelson, F. and O. S. Makko. 2005. Communities, Conservation, and Conflicts in the Tanzanian Serengeti: Preserving Rights to gain Benefits, http://www.sandcounty.net/assets/chapters/assets_chapter_5.pdf.
Neumann, R.P. 1998. Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Songorwa, A.N. 1999. "Community €“Based Wildlife Management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the communities interested?," World Development 27, 12:2061-79.
Stieglitz, J. 2002. Globalization and its Discontents. London: Penguin.
Tanzania Natural Resource Forum. 2009. Using the Nation ' s Resources to Reduce Poverty: Analysis of MKUKUTA Outcomes (2005-2009) Related to Forest and Wildlife Resources as a Contribution to the MKUKUTA Review, http://www.policyforum-tz.org/files/TNRFMKUKUTA.pdf.
URT. 2007. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism: The Wildlife Policy of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: The Government Printer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © by Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except for short extracts in fair dealing, for research or private study, critical scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledgement.
The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs [ISSN 0856-0056 (Print) & ISSN 1821-889X (Online)] is published bi-annually, June and December by the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35042 €“ Dar es Salaam €“ Tanzania
