Ecological Modernization Theory and Sustainable Development Dilemmas: Who benefits from technological innovation?
Abstract
In this paper, I critically analyse the assertion by ecological modernization theorists that technological innovation and the application of market mechanisms would lead to sustainable development. Ecological modernization theory contends that advancement in technological efficiency and adoption of market mechanisms would create economic competitiveness and environmentally benign outcomes. Improvement in technological efficiency is widely seen as an ideal policy instrument in supporting global efforts to protect the environment and reduce greenhouse gases emissions such as carbon dioxide. However, it appears that the advancement in technological innovation and existing market mechanisms have largely benefited transnational corporations from industrialized countries and undermined efforts to achieve sustainable development in less industrialized nations. Using empirical evidence from less industrialized nations, the paper shows how transnational corporations have relocated their pollution intensive technologies to less industrialized nations through trade or direct investment. In this paper, I argue that, relocating pollution intensive technologies in less industrialized nations may have profound implications for global efforts to protect the environment and achieve sustainable development goals.
Keywords: Ecological modernization, sustainable development, transnational corporations
Masoud Dauda, Lecturer, University of Dar es Salaam; Email: masouddauda@udsm.ac.tz
References
Abdul-Gafaru, A. 2006. Are Multinational Corporations Compatible with Sustainable Development? The Experience of Developing Countries. Georgia Tech Center for International Business Education and Research. Working Paper Series 2007-2008-Working Paper 001-07/08.
ADB, 1997. Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects. Asian Development Bank, Economics and Development Resource Centre, February 1997.
Agbonifo, J. 2018. Environment and Conflict: The Place and Logic of Collective Action in the Niger Delta, First Edition, Routledge.
Baker, S. 2016. Sustainable Development. Second Edition, Routledge, 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN.
Baker, S., 2006. Sustainable Development. First Edition, Routledge, 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN.
Baum, F.E., Sanders, D.M., Fisher, M., Anaf, J., Freudenberg, N., Friel, S., Labonte, R., London, L., Monteiro, C., Scott-Samuel, A., and Sen, A. 2016. Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: its importance and a framework. Globalization and Health, 12 (27).
Carter, N. 2007. "The Politics of the Environment €“ Ideas, Activism, Policy". Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Carter, N. 2001. "The Politics of the Environment €“ Ideas, Activism, Policy". First Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cooney, P. and Sacher, W. 2019 (eds.). Environmental Impacts of Transnational Corporations in the Global South: Research in Political Economy, Volume 33. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Dauda, M. 2012. Renewable energy in Rural areas: the best path to sustainable development? A case Study in Rural Tanzania €“ PhD thesis, University of Kent, UK
Dinham, B. and Sarangi, S. 2002. The Bhopal gas tragedy 1984 to? The evasion of corporate responsibility. Environment & Urbanization Volume 14 (1): 89-99.
Elliott, L. 2004. The Global Politics of the Environment. Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan.
Gendron, C. 2012. Regulation Theory and Sustainable Development: Business Leaders and Ecological Modernisation, First Edition, Routledge.
Giddens, A. 2009. Sociology: Sixth Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. 1991. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research: Working Paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge MA.
Hansen, M.W. 1998. Transnational Corporations in Sustainable Development: An Appraisal of the Environmental Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Less Developed Countries, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School PhD-series 3 €“ 1998.
Harper, C.L. 2016. Environment and Society. Human perspectives on Environmental Issues. Fifth Edition, Routledge.
He,J. 2007. "Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis valid for developing countries? A survey," Cahiers de recherche/Working Paper 07-03, Departement d ' Economique de la Faculte d ' administration à l'Universite de Sherbrooke.
Howes, M., McKenzie, M., Gleeson, B., Gray, R., Byrne, J., Daniels, P., 2010. Adapting ecological modernisation to the Australian context. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 7 (1), 5-21.
Ietto-Gillies, G., 2012. Transnational Corporations and International Production: Concepts, Theories and Effects: Concepts, Theories and Effects, Second Edition, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
IRMA, 2018. (ed.). Sustainable Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications. Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, Information Science Reference, 701 F., Chocolate Avenue, Hershey PA, USA 17033.
Ives, J. H. 2018. (ed.). The export of Hazard: Transnational Corporations and Environmental Control Issues. Routledge Library Editions: Multinationals, First Edition, Routledge.
Kanie, N. and Biermann, F. 2017 (eds). Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lélé,S. 1991. "Sustainable development: a critical review", World Development, 19(6):607-21.
Madeley, J. 2008. Big Business, Poor Peoples: How Transnational Corporations Damage the World ' s Poor. Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London N1 9JF, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Martinussen, J. 2004. Society, State & Market. A guide to competing theories of development. Zed Books Ltd, London & New York.
Mikler, J. 2018. The Political Power of Global Corporations. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Morimoto, T. 2005. Growing industrialization and our damaged planet: The extraterritorial application of developed countries ' domestic environmental laws to transnational corporations abroad. Utrecht Law Review Volume 1(2), 134-159.
Nayar, P.K. 2017. Bhopal ' s Ecological Gothic: Disaster, Precarity, and the Biopolitical Uncanny. Lexington Books.
Peterson, M.J. 2008. "Bhopal Plant Disaster". International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering. See www.umass.edu/sts/ethics. Available and accessed on 10th May, 2018.
Pietersen, C. 2014. The Two Largest Industrial Disasters in History with Hazardous Material: The investigations, facts and lessons for Process Safety. KW Publishers Pvt Ltd, New Delhi 110002.
Reed, D. 1996. Structural Adjustment, the Environment, and Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan.
Rogers, P.P., Jalal, K.F., and Boyd J.A. 2008. An Introduction to Sustainable Development: Earthscan, London.
Sosa-Nunez, G. and Atkins, E. 2016 (eds). Environment, Climate Change and International Relations. E-International Relations Publishing. Creative Commons CC BY-NC-4.0 license.
Smallman, C.S. and Bown, K. (2011). Introduction to International and Global Studies. University of North Carolina Press.
Sutton, P.W. 2007. The Environment. A Sociological Introduction. Polity Press, 65 Bridge Street, Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Uitto, J.I., Puri, J., van den Berg, R.D., 2017 (eds). Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development. SpringerOpen.
UN, 2018. The Sustainable Development Goals Report, 2018. United Nations Publications, 300 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, United States of America.
WCED, 1987. Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, New York.
Wong, L. 2008. "Revisiting rights and responsibility: the case of Bhopal", Social Responsibility Journal, Volume 4 (1/2):143-157.
York, R. and Rosa, E.A. 2003. Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory: Institutional Efficacy, Case Study Evidence, Units of Analysis, and the Pace of Eco-Efficiency. Organization & Environment 16 (3): 273-288.
Young, S.C. 2000 (ed.). The Emergence of Ecological Modernisation: Integrating the Environment and the Economy? Routledge research into Environmental Politics, Routledge.
Yusuf, H.O. and Omoteso, K. 2016. Combating environmental irresponsibility of transnational corporations in Africa: an empirical analysis, Local Environment, 21(11), 1372-1386.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © by Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except for short extracts in fair dealing, for research or private study, critical scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledgement.
The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs [ISSN 0856-0056 (Print) & ISSN 1821-889X (Online)] is published bi-annually, June and December by the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35042 €“ Dar es Salaam €“ Tanzania
