Influence of Tempering and Cryogenic Treatment on Retained Austenite and Residual Stresses in Carbonitrided 18CrNiMo7-6 Low Alloy Steel
Abstract
This work investigated the influence of tempering conditions coupled with cryogenic treatment on thermal stabilization of retained austenite and residual stress distributions in carbonitrided 18CrNiMo76 low alloy steel samples. The carbonitriding conditions were set to enable attaining surface carbon and nitrogen content of 0.87 and 0.34 mass.-percent respectively. After carbonitriding, some of the samples were subjected to varying tempering conditions followed by cryogenic treatment at -120 °C using nitrogen gas. Analysis of both retained austenite and residual stresses was conducted using X-ray diffraction. In the as-quenched state, carbonitrided samples contained 52 mass.-percent. Samples that were directly subjected to the cryogenic treatment after quenching retained only about 20 mass.-percent of austenite. Samples subjected to variant tempering conditions coupled with cryogenic treatment retained at least 30 masses.-percent of austenite. A thermal stabilization of retained austenite which increases with increasing temperature was identified. On tempering at 240 °C for 14 hours retained austenite becomes unstable and decomposes to bainite leading to the low initial amount of retained austenite before cryogenic treatment. It can be concluded that the tempering process coupled with cryogenic treatment leads to an increasing hardness, to higher compressive residual stresses as well as to a shift of the location of maximum compressive residual stress toward the surface.
Keywords: Carbonitriding, cryogenic, residual stress, residual stress, tempering, XRD.
References
Bischoff S., Klümper-Westkamp H., Hoffmann F. and Zoch H.W. (2010). Development of a sensor system for gas carbonitriding- Part 1. Journal Heat Treatm. Mat., 65(3): 141-148.
Cheng L. Böttger A, and Mittemeijer E. M (1992). Tempering of iron-carbon-nitrogen martensites. Metallurgical Transaction A,
A: 1129-1145.
Chongmin K., Diesburg, D. E. and Buck R.M. (1981). Influence of sub-zero and shot- peening treatments on impact and fatigue
fracture properties of case-hardened steels. Journal Heat Treating, 2: 43-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF02833073
Colaço R. and Vilar R. (2004). Stabilisation of retained austenite in laser surface melted tool steels. Materials Science and Engineering A, 385: 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.06.069
Davis J.R. (Ed). (2002). Surface Hardening of Steel: Understanding the Basics, ASM International. ISBN: 978-0-87170-764-2
Eigenmann B. and Macherauch E. (1996). Wontgenographische Untersuchung von Spannungszustanden in Werkstoffen. Mat.- wiss. u. Werkstofftech. Part 111: 27 426- 437.
Epp J., Hirsch T. and Curfs C. (2012). In situ X-ray diffraction analysis of unexpected carbon partitioning during quenching of low carbon steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 43A: 2210-2217.
Ingham D.W. and Clarke P.C. (1983). Carburise Case Hardening €“ Computer Prediction of Structure and Hardness Distribution, Heat Treat. Met., 4: 91-98.
Katemi R.J., Epp J., Hoffmann F. and Steinbacher M. (2014a). Characterization of Carbonitrided 18CrNiMo7-6 Steel. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Mechanical and Industrial Engineering MIE'2014: 170-175.
Katemi R.J., Epp J., Hoffmann F. and Steinbacher M. (2014b). Investigations of Residual Stress Distributions in Retained Austenite and Martensite after Carbonitriding of a Low Alloy Steel.
Advanced Materials Research, 996: 550- 555. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.550
Kim C. (1983). Fracture of Case-Hardened Steels and Residual Stress Effect in Case- Hardened Steels: Microstructural and
Residual Stress Effects.
Kokosza A. and Pacyna J. (2005). Evaluation of retained austenite stability in heat treated cold work tool steel. Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, 162-163: 327-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.068
Larson J.A. and Shin S.W. (1980). Retained austenite and its measurement by X-ray diffraction. SP-453, SAE.
Mohanty O.N. (1995). On the stabilization of retained austenite: mechanism and kinetics. Material Science and Engineering B32: 267- 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921- 5107(95)03017-4
Okhi C. (2006). Atmospheric Control Method for JIS-SUJ2 Carbonitriding Processes. NTN Technical Review No. 74.
Parrish G. (1999). Carburizing: Microstructures and Properties, ASM International. ISBN: 978-0-87170-666-9
Podder A.S. and Bhadeshia H.K.D.H. (2010). Thermal stability of austenite retained in bainitic steels. Materials Science and Engineering A, 527(7-8): 2121-2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.063
Sastry C.N., Khan K.H. and Wood W.E. (1982). Mechanical Stability of Retained Austenite in Quenched and Tempered AISI
Steel. Metallurgical Transactions A, 13A: 676-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644435
Stratton P. and Surberg C.H. (2009). Retained austenite stabilization. Heat Treating Progress. 9(2): 25-27.
Takaki S., Fukunaga K., Syarif J. and Tsuchiyama T. (2004). Effect of Grain refinement on Thermal Stability of Metastable Austenitic Steel. Material Transactions, 45(7): 2245-2251.
Young R.A. (1993). The Rietveld Method, International Union of. Crystallography (IUCr) Book Series, Oxford University Press.
Zhang S. and Findley K.O. (2013). Quantitative assessment of the effects of microstructure on the stability of retained austenite in TRIP steels. Acta Materialia, 61: 1895-1903.
