Coastal and Marine Environment Management Projects and Communities’ Livelihood: The Case of MACEMP
Abstract
The Marine and Coastal Environmental Management Project (MACEMP) was conceived as a response to local, national and global concerns on sustainable conservation and use of marine and coastal resources. It has been involved in facilitating fisheries management for the purpose of empowering coastal communities to access opportunities so that they can request, implement and monitor sub-projects that contribute to improve livelihoods and sustainable marine ecosystem management, e.g., aquaculture. This paper assesses MACEMP by looking at the welfare implication between the treatment group and the control group using household and village level survey data collected from Mafia District in Coast region. Data were collected using questionnaire, interviews and field observation. In analyzing the information collected the study utilized Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Results of all methods of analysis show that the project has positive impact on poverty reduction in Mafia District as revealed by the differences in poverty status between the treatment group and the control group.
References
Costanza, R., R. D’Arge, R. De Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton & M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the worlds’ ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387: 253-260.
Baker, J. L. 2000. Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: a handbook for practitioners. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Deaton. A. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Deaton. A. & S. Zaidi. 2002. Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. Living. Standards Measurement Study Working Paper No 135 Vol.104. XI, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Ellis, F. 1999. Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: evidence and implication. Natural Resource Perspective 40.
Filmer, D. & L.H. Pritchett. 1998. Estimating wealth effect without income or expenditure data – or tears: Educational enrollments in India. Washington DC.: The World Bank.
Francis and Bryceson. 2001. Tanzanian Coastal and Marine Resources. Some examples illustrating questions of sustainable use.
Jianjun, J., R. Shenghong & Z. Lingjie. 2002. A study on the cost of coastal zone resources. Marine Environment Science, Vol. 20, No. 1: 63-67.
Mkenda A. F. 2007. Marine parks and household poverty in Tanzania: A Baseline Analysis. Tanzania Journal of Development Studies, 7: 48-63.
—. 2009. A report on household economics baseline survey in coastal communities: Rufiji, Mafia and Kilwa districts. WWF-Tanzania Project Office.
Morris, S. S., C. Carletto, et al.. (2000). Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54: 381-387.
National Bureau of Statistics. 2008. Household Budget Survey, 2006/2007. Dar es Salaam.
Ravallion, M. 2000. The mystery of the vanishing benefits: An introduction to impact evaluation. The World Bank Economic Review, 15: 5-140.
Sahn, D. E. & D. Stifel. 2001. Exploring Alternative Measures of Welfare in the Absence of Expenditure Data. Cornell University.
SCL Project. 2000. Sustainability Enhancing and Diversifying Livelihoods of the Coastal Poor, www.livelihoods.org
URT. 2005. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Natural Resource and Tourism, Fisheries division.
Walters, J.S., J. Maragos, S. Siar & A.T. White. 1998. Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment: A Handbook for Community Workers and Coastal Resources Managers. Coastal Resource Management Project and Silliman University, Cebu City, Philippines.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.