TRANSFORMING HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES IN THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY UNIVERSITIES: FROM ENDANGERMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY
Abstract
This study was conducted in eight universities within the East African Community (EAC). Its objective was to investigate the endangerment situation of the Humanities in order to suggest some lessons for Rwanda
in transforming the teaching of these subjects. The endangerment was measured in terms of stakeholder salience, declining student enrolment, government budget-cuts as well as the devalorisation of these disciplines and negative society perceptions towards them. The study investigates the causes and consequences of this endangerment and shows how the embattled disciplines can be helped to survive. It draws on the stakeholders ' theory of salience to argue that less salient stakeholders in universities can have their saliency strengthened through policy. Humanities are disciplines holding the key towards solving a set of complex social problems in the current globalised world because they offer a sure channel of imparting analytical and critical thinking skills, effective argumentation and negotiation skills. It is argued that if left
unchecked, the current devalorisation of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (HASS) in favour of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) will eventually lead to a non-holistic education with
inadequate skills for all categories of students, including science ones. Graduates need these skills to cope with challenging social demands in their workplace.
Key words: Arts, endangerment, Humanities, HASS, stakeholders ' theory of salience, critical thinking skills, holistic education, job opportunities, STEM
References
Alfa en Gamma Stralen [AWT]. (2007). Alfa en Gamma stralen €”
Valorisatiebeleid voor de Alfaen Gammawetenschappen. Den
Haag: Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps-en Innovatiebeleid.
Allen, M. 1988. The goals of universities. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Armitage, D. and Bhabha, H. 2013. Mapping the future of humanities at Harvard University.www.http://harvardmagazine.com/sites/default/files/Ma
pping%20the%20Future%20of%20the%20Humanities.pdf.
Accessed June 16, 2016.
Arts and Humanities Research Councils [AHRC]. 2006. AHRC ' s
knowledge transfer plan. Swindon: AHRC.
http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/images/4_97014.pdf. Accessed May 14,
Barnett, R. (Ed.) 1990. The idea of higher education. Buckingham: Society
for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Barnett, R. 2000. Realising a compact for higher education. In K. Moti
Gokulsing and C. DaCosta (Eds.). A compact for higher education.
Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 33-45.
Bauman, Z. 1997. Universities: Old, New, and Different. In: A. Smith and F.
Webster (Eds.) The Postmodern University? contested visions of higher
education in society. London: SRHE and Open University Press. pp. 1726.
Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B.W. 2009. Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorization. Higher Education 59 (1)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602420 Accessed April 11, 2016.
Beyer, B. K. 1995. Critical thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/University/inivlibrary/library.nclk
Accessed January 24, 2016.
Blaxter, L. Hughes, C. and Tight, M. 1996. How to research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Blommaert, J. 2001. The Asmara declaration as a sociolinguistic problem: Reflections on scholarship and linguistic rights. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1): 131-155.
Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. 1998. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bridgman, T. and Wilmott, H. 2007. Academics in the €—knowledge
economy ' : From expert to intellectual? In A. Harding, A. Scott, S.
Laske, and C. Burtscher (Eds.) Bright satanic mills: universities,
regional development and the knowledge economy. Ashgate:
Aldershot, pp. 20-50.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, M. and March, J. 1974. Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York: McGraw Hill.
Creswell, W.J. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.) California: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 2005. The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) London: Sage Publications.
Duchêne, A. and Monica, H. 2007. Discourses of endangerment. London: Continuum Press.
Engell J. and Dangerfield, A. 2005. Saving higher education in the age of money. http://harvardmagazine.com/sites/default/files/Mapping%20the%20Future%20of%20the%20Humanities.pdf. Accessed August 15,
Freeland, J. and Patrick, D. (Eds.) 2000. Language rights and language survival. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.Boston: Pitman.
Geiger, R. L. 1993. Research and relevant knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Government of Rwanda [GoR]. 2013. Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy 2013-2018: Shaping our development. Kigali: GoR.
Harpham, G.G. 2011. The humanities and the dream of America.
http://harvardmagazine.com/sites/default/files/Mapping%20the%20Future%20of%20the%20Humanities.pdf. Accessed January 12,
Higgins, J. 2011. Dilemma of the humanities. http://mg.co.za/article/201106-24-dilemma-of-the-humanities.
Accessed February 24, 2016.
Hill, J. 2002. €—Expert rhetorics ' in advocacy for endangered languages: Who is listening and what do they hear? Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12: 119-153.
Jongbloed, B. Enders, J. and Salerno, C. 2007. Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education 56(3): 303 €“324.
Jwan J.O. and Ong ' ondo, C.O. 2011. Qualitative research: An
introduction to principles and techniques. Eldoret: Moi University
Press.
Mason, J. 2002. The use and misuse of focus groups.
http://www.useit.com/papers/focusgroups.html. Accessed August
, 2016.
May, T. 2007. Regulation, engagement and academic production. In A. Harding, A. Scott, S. Laske, and C. Burtscher (Eds.) Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development and the knowledge economy. Ashgate: Aldershot, pp. 119-132.
Mitchell, R.K. Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. 1997. Towards a theory of
stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of
who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review
(4): 853-886.
National Unity and Reconciliation Commission [NURC]. 2008. The causes of violence after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Kigali: NURC.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 2007. Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, regionally engaged. Paris: OECD/Institutional Management of Higher Education.
Scriven, M. and Paul, R. 1996. Defining critical thinking: A draft
statement for the National Council for Excellence in Critical
Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/University/inivlibrary/library.nclk Accessed August2, 2016.
Silverstein, M. 1998. Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 401-426.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Uganda Government [UG]. 1992. Government white paper on
implementation of the recommendation of the report of the
Education Policy Review Commission. Kampala: UG.
