The Discourse of Conflict in Social Media Networks
Abstract
Conflict in online discussions has the potential to polarise individuals ' perceptions
of any online political related post, yet political communication scholarship has paid
little attention to systematic study of how verbal attacks play out in online discussions
of political related posts. This paper takes a critical look at some samples of online
readers ' comments to the news post issued by the European Union condemning the
rise of political-related violence in Tanzania on the Tanzania based online
platform ˆ’JamiiForums ˆ’in order to see how language is used by individuals to
express their view points and opinions on the news event. This study applies van
Dijk's (2006) socio-cognitive approach of positive-self and negative-other
polarisation in the readers' comments on the news event.
Keywords: social media network, conflict discourse, self presentation, other
presentation.
References
Ayoola, K. A. 2008. A critical discourse analysis of the reporting of some Niger-Delta issues in selected Nigerian newspapers, 1999-2007. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Chiluwa, I. E. 2011. Labelling and ideology in the press: a corpus-based critical discourse study of the Niger Delta crisis. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
Giddens, A. 2006. Sociology. Fifth edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kim, E.-M., and Sun, Y.-H. 2006. The effect of ' replies ' in Internet news on the audience. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 50(4):33-64.
Kurizaki, S. 2007. Efficient secrecy: Public versus private threats in crisis diplomacy. American Political Science Review 101(3): 543 €“558.
Lee, E.-J. 2010. Effects of readers ' comments on Internet news sites on construction of social reality: The moderating role of need for orientation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association annual conference, Singapore, n. d.
Lee, J.-S. and Sung, M. 2007. The effects of reading replies on the perception of online news articles: Focusing on the PR perspective. Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations 9(4): 7-45.
Na, E.K. and Rhee, J.W. 2008. A study on readers ' comments: Changes in the online news usage pattern and the implications for discursive public. Seoul, Korea: Korea Press Foundation.
Nelson, D. 2003. Conclusion: word peace. In At war with words. Eds. M. N. Dedaic and D. Nelson. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 449-462.
Oha, O. 1994. Language in war situation: a stylistic study of war speeches of Yakubu Gowon and Emeka Ojukwu. Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of English, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Pillay, K., van Niekerk, B. and Maharaj, M. 2010. Web 2.0 and its implications for the military. In On the uses of ICT in warfare and the safeguarding of peace. Eds. J. Phahlamohlaka, L. Leenen, N. Veerasmay, M. Modise, and R. van Heerden Bela-Bela. Proceedings of a workshop. 11th October. South Africa: Council for Scientific Research., pp. 50-57.
Smith, D. 1997. Language and discourse in conflict and conflict resolution. Current Issues in Language & Society 4(3): 190 -214.
van Dijk, T. 1991. Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. 1995. Opinions and ideologies in the press. Approach to media discourse. Eds. A. Bell and P. Garrett. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 21-63.
van Dijk, T. 1997. Discourse as social interaction. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
van Dijk, T. 2006. Ideology and discourse: a multidisciplinary introduction. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University.
Yang, H.S. 2008. The effects of the opinion and quality of user postings on Internet news readers ' attitude toward the news issue. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 52: 254-280.
