Social Networking as Power Balancing in Tanzanian Politics
Abstract
Online social networks have made communication more accessible in many spheres; they have been used as an alternative political means of regaining or equalising power between a political opposition and a ruling party, when the former is functioning in the absence of a traditional political platform. Recently opposition politicians in Tanzania have utilised online social networks towards this end. Positioning theory draws out this political dynamic in operation. Historically, political communication using electronically transmitted networks in Tanzania was necessitated after the fifth-phase presidency (beginning in 2015) placed a ban on political activities reaching outside their official jurisdictions and naming specific candidates. This ban seemed to weaken opposition politicians because they were regarded as preferring to work in collectives. The analysis here focuses on a press conference involving a United Republic of Tanzania Member of Parliament from the opposition party, addressing the national and international communities in regard to secrecy that surrounded a late arrival of two new jets into Tanzania from Canada, late in 2016. The data suggests that online social networking has enabled opposition politicians to identify themselves as fellow sufferers and representatives of the ordinary citizen, demanding good governance and speaking against misappropriation and laxity in distribution and use of national resources. The opposition has gone further in utilising social media to present the nation ' s presidential agenda as pitted against the ordinary citizen. Social media allows the opposition to represent the current government as an elite group responsible for the problems Tanzanians are facing, and therefore as untrustworthy. This limited case study reveals how electronic media re-introduces a potential for effective political opposition to the status quo at a national level.
Key words: online social networks, Tanzania, politics, political ban
References
Blommaert, J. 2017. Online-offline Modes of Identity and Community: Elliot Rodger ' s Twisted World of Masculine Victimhood. Netherlands: Tilburg University.
Cairnie, T.P. 2010. A Positioning Theory Analysis of Language and Conflict in Political Processes. In Words of Conflict, Words of War: How the Language We Use in Political Processes Sparks Fighting. Eds. F. Moghaddam and R. Harre. Oxford: Praeger.
Chilton, P and Schäffner, C. 2002. Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Christakis, N.A and Fowler, H.J. 2009. Connected: the Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and how they Shape our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Dunmire, P.L. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(11): 735 €“751.
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fairclough, I and Fairclough, N. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. 2000. The subject and power. In Power: Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954 €“1984. (Ed.) J.D. Faubion. London: Penguin, pp. 326-348.
Harre, R. and Van Langenhove, L. 1999. The Dynamics of Social Episodes. In Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Eds. R. Harre and L. van Langenhove. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmes, P. 2004. Dictionary of Politics and Government. Third edition.Bloomsbury: P.H. Collin.
McAuley, J.W. 2003. An Introduction to Politics, State and Society. London: SAGE Publications.
Mercea, D. 2012. Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media and Society 14(1) February: 151-167.
Moghaddam, F and Harre, R. 2010 Words of Conflict, Words of War: How the Language We Use in Political Processes Sparks Fighting. Oxford: Praeger.
‚¦airaland Forum. 2018. Soyinka, Anyaoku, Ezekwesili, Bakare, Others, Launch Third Force Movement February - Politics €“ Nairaland. Available at https://www.nairaland.com/4324096/soyinka-anyaokuezekwesili-bakare-others. Accessed 26 December 2018.
Nilsson, L-E. and Brante, E.W. 2010. ' Do I Have to Say Yes? ' A Positioning Theory Perspective on Prioritizing and Dividing Work in School. In Words of Conflict, Words of War: How the Language We Use in Political Processes Sparks Fighting. Eds. F. Moghaddam and R. Harre. Oxford: Praeger, pp. 31-46.
Oser, J., Hooghe, M. and Marien, S. 2013. Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification. Political Research Quarterly 66(1), March : 91-101.
Oyeleye, A. L and Hunjo, H.J. 2013. A Critical Discourse Review of Resistance Consciousness in The Language and Ideology of Social Change Project in Wole Soyinka ' s Political Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics 3(2): 82-97.
Paul, S. A., Hong, L. and Chi, H. 2011. Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study. Proceedings of the Fifth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona: ICWSM, pp. 578-581. Available at
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.309.3513&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 27 December 2018.
Porta, D. D and Mosca, L. 2005. Global-Net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements. Journal of Public Policy 25(1) January-April: 165-190.
Storck, M. 2011. The Role of Social Media in Political Mobilisation: a Case Study of the January 2011 Egyptian Uprising. MA dissertation. University of St Andrews, Scotland.
Sun, Y., Liu, L., Peng, X., Dong, Y and Barnes, S.J. 2014. Understanding Chinese users ' continuance intention toward online social networks: an integrative theoretical model. Electron Markets 24: 57-66.
Theocharis, Y; Lowe, W; van Deth, J.W and Albacete, G.M.G. 2013. Using Twitter to Mobilise Protest Action: Transnational Online Mobilization Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and Aganaktismenoi movements. Delivered to the 41st European Consortium for Political Research. Joint Sessions of Workshops Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, March 11-16. Panel: The transnational dimension of protest: from the Arab Spring to Occupy Wall Street.
Ugwubujor, Magnus. 2018. Soyinka ' s verdict on the Third Force. The Independent. April 25. Available at
https://www.independent.ng/soyinkas-verdict-on-the-third-force/.
Accesssed at 26 December 2018.
Van Langenhove, L and Harre, R. 1999. Introducing Positioning Theory. In Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Eds. L. Van Langehove and R. Harre. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 14-31.
White, J. 2017. Principled Disobedience in the EU. Constellations 24: 637-649. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12283
Williams, C. B and Gulati, G. 2008. What is a Social Network Worth? Facebook and Vote Share in the 2008 Presidential Primaries. Prepared or delivery at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28-31, 2008. Department of International Studies and Government Bentley College. Reading draft available at
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.471.7745&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 27 December 2018.
