Examination of Rhetorical Devices in President Kikwete's 2014 Constituent Assembly Inaugural Speech
Abstract
Language has been an important tool for politicians to get their messages perceived the way they prefer. This paper analyzed a text of the constituent assembly inaugural speech by President Jakaya Kikwete. It sought to examine the ways he appealed to linguistic techniques to amplify on the challenges of a proposed three-government union structure proposed by the Constitutional Review Commission. By using Fraiclough ' s (1992) Text Oriented Discourse Analysis (TODA), the study examined linguistic features of the speech amplifying on the two major challenges of the proposed three-government union structure. The data show that President Kikwete relied on choice of words, reference to comments made by famous individuals about the union structure as well as rhetorical question as he amplified on the two challenges of a proposed three-government union structure.
Key words: critical discourse analysis, political discourse, persuasion, Constituent Assembly
References
Black, E. (1965). Rhetorical Criticism. New York: Mcmillan. Campbell, K. K. & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Deeds Done in Word: Presidential Rhetoric and Genres of Governance. Chicago. CUP.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive
Power of Metaphor (2nd ed.). Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Print.
Chilton, P. (2005). Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 19 €“51.
Chilton, P and C. Schäffner. (1997). Discourse and Politics. In T. A.
van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage:
€“30.
Cockcroft, R. (2004). Putting Aristotle to the Proof: Style, Substance
and the EPL Group. Language and Literature, 13(3):195 €“215.
David, M. K. (2014). Language, Power and Manipulation: The Use of
Rhetoric in Maintaining Political Influence. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 5(1): 164 €“17.
Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication Research: A History. In C. R.
Berger & S. H. Chaffee (eds.). The Handbook of Communication Science, pp. 20-97. Newbury Park. CA: Sage: 20 €“97.
Diamond, G. & Cobb, M. (1999). The Candidate as Catastrophe:
Latitude Theory and the Problems of Political Persuasion. In D. Mutz, P. Sniderman & Richard Brody (eds.). Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.
Demirdogen, U. D. (2010). The Roots of Research in (Political) Persuasion: Ethos, Pathos, Logos and the Yale Studies of Persuasive Communications. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 3(1): 189 €“201.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge:Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge.
Galasso, V. & Nannicini, T. (2016). Persuasion and Gender:
Experimental Evidence from Two Political Campaigns. Discussion Paper Series, No. IZA DP No. 9906.
Hart, R. P. (1984). Verbal Style and the Presidency: A computer-Based Analysis. New York: cademic Press.
Heywood, A. (2002). Politics. New York: Palgrave.
Hodges, A. (2008). The Dialogic Emergence of ' Truth ' in Politics:
Reproduction and Subversion of the ' War on Terror ' Discourse.
Colorado Research in Linguistics 21: 1 €“12. Available
at:www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume21_Issue1/paper_HOD
GES.pdf. Accessed on 12.3
Hollihan, T. A. & Baaske, K. T. (2005). Arguments and Arguing: The
Products and Process of Human Decision Making (2nd ed.).
Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Kikwete, J. M. Hotuba Ya Rais Wa Jamhuri Ya Muungano Wa
Tanzania, Mheshimiwa Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, Wakati Wa
Kulihutubia Bunge Maalum La Katiba, Tarehe 21 Machi
, Dodoma. Available at
http://www.muungano.go.tz.Web.10Mar.2015.<http://www.mu
ungano.go.tz/files/publications/attachments/HOTUBA_YA_RA
IS_WAKATI_WA_KULIHUTUBIA_BUNGE_MAALUMU_LA_KATIBA_-_FINAL 4_sw_sw.pdf>
Mooney, A. et al. (2011). Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. Hoboken NJ: Taylor & Francis.
Mutz, D., Sniderman, P. & Brody, R. (1999). Political Persuasion and
Attitude Change. The University of Michigan Press: Ann
Arbor.
Obeng, S. G. (2003). Language in African Social Interaction:
Indirectness in Akan Communication. New York: Nova Science.
Odey, V.C. (2016). A Critical Discourse Analysis of President Goodluck Jonathan ' s CONFAB Speech. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, (26): 18 €“23.
Aworo-Okoroh, J. (2016). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Muhammad Buhari ' s Speeches. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 3(6): 562 €“586.
Poggi, I. (2005). The Goals of Persuasion. Pragmatics and Cognition,
(2). John Benjamin Publishing Company: 297 €“336.
Rotello, C. M. & Heit, E. (2009). Modeling the Effects of Argument
Length and Validity on Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35:1317 €“1330.
Sharndama, E. C. (2015). Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse
Analysis of President Muhammad Buhari ' s Inaugural Speech. European Journal of English Language and Linguistic Research, 3(3): 12 €“24.
Snyder, C. R. & Higgins, R. L. (1990). Reality Negotiation and Excuse-making: President Reagan ' s 4 March 1987 Iran Arms Scandal Speech and Other Literature. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (eds.). The Psychology of Tactical Communication. Monographs in Social Psychology of Language, 2. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: 207 €“228.
Stuckey, M. E. (1989). Getting into the Game: The Pre-Presidential
Rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. New York: Praeger.
Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Cognitive Structural Analysis of Political Rhetoric: Methodological and Theoretical Issues. In S. lyengar & W. J. McGuire (eds.). Explorations in Political Psychology. Dulce Studies in Political Psychology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 380 €“405.
Thompson, K. W. (ed.). (I987). The History and Philosophy of Rhetoric and Political Discourse. Washington, DC University Press of America.
van Dijk, T. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D.
Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishing: Blackwell: 352 €“371.
Vickers, B. (1988). In Defense of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wodak, R. (2011). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as
Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © by Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, University of Dar es Salaam
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except for short extracts in fair dealing, for research or private study, critical scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledgement.