Entry and Ramifications of Neo-Liberalism for Education in Tanzania: What is the Possible Alternative?

Authors

  • George Kahangwa University of Dar es Salaam

Abstract

What takes place in an education system is influenced by, among other things, ideologies that exist in society. In recent years, the ideological influence on education in Tanzania has changed from Ujamaa thinking to neo-liberalism. This paper traces the entry of the latter into Tanzania ' s education and its ramifications. The paper is based on a study whose objectives were to establish how neo-liberalist ideas entered Tanzania ' s education system; identify the ramifications and impact of neo-liberalism on the provision of education in Tanzania; and trace the possible ideological alternative for Tanzania ' s education. It is argued in the paper that neo-liberalism has been responsible for the introduction of problematic cost-sharing policies in education, the under-financing of education, and attenuation of education quality. On a wider scope, ideology has also caused the failure of locally produced goods, the market for agricultural products to diminish, agricultural crop prices to plummet, the number of youth petty traders to increase in urban centres, and many to lose their jobs.   Since Tanzania needs to address the negative impact of neo-liberalism, the paper proposes what could be a suitable alternative ideology for education in the country.

 

Key words: Neo-liberalism, Education, Tanzania

References

Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Buchert, L. (1997). Education policy formulation in Tanzania: Coordination between the government and international aid agencies. Paris: UNESCO, IIEP.

Canaan, J.E and Shumar, W. (2008). Structure and agency in the neo-liberal University. New York: Routledge.

Chang, H. (2002). Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the State. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), pp. 539-559.

Chang, H., and Grabel, I. (2004). Reclaiming development: An alternative economic policy manual. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing Ltd.

Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neo-liberalism and global order. London: Turnaround Publishers Services Ltd.

Drahos, P., and Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy? London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giroux, H.A. (2002). Neo-liberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), pp. 425-463.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neo-liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyslop-Margison, E.J., and Sears, A.M. (2006). Neo-liberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic citizenship. Dordrech: Springer.

Ishengoma, M.J. (2004). Cost-sharing in higher education in Tanzania: Fact or fiction? JHEA/RESA, 2(2), pp.101 €“133.

Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., and Wodak, R. (Eds). Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Kahangwa, G. (2013). The influence of knowledge-based economy imaginary on higher education policies and practices in Tanzania. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol.

Kenway, J., Bullen, E., and Robb, S. (2004). The knowledge economy, the techno-preneur and the problematic future of the univeristy. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2). pp. 330-349.

Knorr Cetina, K. (1999), Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Levidow, L. (2002). Marketing higher education: neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies. Robins, Kevin and Webster, Frank (Eds). The virtual university? Knowledge, markets and management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 227 €“248.

Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketization: the implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1).

Martinez, E., and Garcia, A. (2000). What is neo-liberalism? A brief definition. Available at: http://www.csom.umn.edu/labor-education-service/programs courses/documents/What_is_Neoliberalism.pdf.

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (MoEVT). (2007). Policy issues: The relationship between the education sector reforms and other national policies. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education and Vocational Training.

Mueller, A. (2009). What is neo-liberal? Available at: http://www.nachdenkseiten.de

Roger, N., Sobolev, Y., Dunn, D., Hajdenberg, A., Hobdari, N., Maziad, S., and Roudet, S. (2009). Tanzania: the story of an African transition. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/books/2009/tanzania/tanzania.pdf.

Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Trowler, P. (1998). Education policy: A policy sociology approach. East Sussex: Guildredge Social Policy.

Downloads

Published

19.03.2018

Issue

Section

Articles