Constructivism: Its Implications for Language Teaching and Second-Language Acquisition
Abstract
This article presents the term constructivism both as a theory of learning and as a philosophical concept. In this regard, principles and assumptions of the theory of constructivism as propounded by its proponents, viz.: Immanuel Kant, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, have been revisited to establish its link with language teaching and second-language acquisition. To bring the implications to light, this article makes use of five selected key theoretical [case] studies underpinning the connection between constructivism and language teaching and second-language acquisition. The analysis indicates certain key observations. One is that language teaching-learning and language acquisition are both activities that involve interactions between the teacher and the learner. However, to create knowledge, the teacher is required [enjoined] to facilitate and guide learners to ' discover ' . In accordance with the constructivist theory of learning, learning is not only individual but also active, as the creation of knowledge is socially constructed. In this way, the language learner must be enabled to independently learn and socially interact with others in order to acquire the linguistic knowledge and skills that a learner will eventually use to interact with others in the real world. These practices are informed by constructivism as it deals with the nature of knowledge and the way knowledge is created. The article, therefore, concludes that in language teaching and learning, both nature and nurture should be supported by creating an enabling environment in which linguistic knowledge is constructed.
Key words: Constructivism, Language; Language teaching; Second-language acquisition; Constructivist Philosophy
References
Ausubel, D. (1965). Application of Ausubel's theory of meaningful verbal learning to curriculum, teaching and learning of deaf students. D. S. Martin (ed.) International symposium on cognition, education & deafness, working papers, 1 (2). Retrieved on 3rd January2016 from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED247712.pdf
Brown, A.L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher 23, 4-12.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University. Retrieved on 3rd January, 2016 from: http://datad.aau.org/.../15BIBLIOGRAPHY.PDF?...5...y
Can, T. (2009). Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 60-74. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from: http://novitasroyal.org/vol.3_1/can.pdf.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Churcher, K.M.A., Downs, E. & Tewksbury, D. (2014). "Friending" Vygotsky: A social constructivist pedagogy of knowledge building through classroom social media use. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(1), 33-50. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from: http://uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/Vol14_1/Churcher.pdf
Cobb, P. (1996). Constructivism and learning. E. De Corte & F. E Weinert (Eds) International Encyclopaedia of Developmental and Instructional Psychology, 338-341, Pergamon Press.
Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995): An introduction to radical constructivism.
Gall, M.D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Jin, L. (2011). Constructivism: Application in oral English teaching to Non-English majors. Global Partners in Education Journal, 1(1), 13-20. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from: www.gpejournal.org/index.php/GPEJ/article/view/
Jones, M.G. & Brader-araje, L. (2002). The Impact of constructivism on education: Language,
discourse and meaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1-10. Retrieved on 3rd January 2016 from: http://ac-journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf
Kao, P. (2010). Examining second language learning: Taking a socio-cultural stance. ARECLS,
, 113-131. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2o16 from: http://ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/volume7/kao-vol7.pdf
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Liu, C.H. & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky ' s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386-399. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854992.pdf
Long, M. (1975). Group work and communicative competence in the ESOL classroom. M. Burt & H. Dulay (Eds.). New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education. Washington: TESOL, 217-223.
Marlowe, B. A. & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Marsh, G.E.,& Ketterer, J.J. (2005). Situating the zone of proximal development. Online Journal
of Distance-Learning Administration 8(2). Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from:http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer82/marsh82.htm.
Mathews, M. (1992). Constructivism and empiricism: An incomplete divorce. Research in Science Education, 22, 299-307.
Neergaard, H., & Ulhoi, J.P. (2007). Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
Nyirenda, S.D. & Ishumi, A. G. M. (2002). Philosophy of education: An introduction to concepts, principles and practice. Dar es Salaam: Dar es Salaam University Press.
O ' Donnell, M. (1997). Constructivism by design and in practice: A review. Issues in Education, 3(2), 285-294.
Philips, D. C. (2000). Constructivism in education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: Framework for an integrated methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, (23), 1-19.
Stone, J.E. (1996). Developmentalism: An obscure but pervasive restriction on educational improvement. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 4. Retrieved on 1st January, 2016 from: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watzlawik, P. The invented reality. London: W. W. Naughton & Co.
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Yang, L. & Wilson, K. (2006). Second-language classroom reading: A social constructivist approach. 5th Anniversary Special Issue, 6(3), 364-372. Retrieved on 2nd January, 2016 from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download.pdf
